To Kill A Mocking Bird :: To Kill a Mockingbird Essays

To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, The 12 Angry men by Reginald Rose and The Scottsboro Trial are all about unfair trials containing discrimination towards different people and people being prepossession .The peoples action towards the defendants affected them for the rest of their life. Many of the people that came into the court brought in their own social problems and that influenced the verdict. To Kill The Mockingbird was about a black quat named Tom Robinson who was accused of raping a young women by the name of Mayella Ewell. In the court, significant manifest was presented to the jurors that would prove that Tom Robinson was innocent. The evidence showed that a left hand male must have beat Mayella because the bruises were on the right side of her and Tom Robinsons left arm was disabled. Robinson could not have beat Ms. Ewell. Tom Robinson was clam up convicted and later on was shot at a prison fence while he was trying to run away. The jurors discriminated Mr. Robin son and was prejudice towards him because all though evidence was presented to them that would prove Tom innocent they ignored it because the guy was black and in the 30s discriminating blacks were heavily favored.The Twelve Angry Men was about a son who was accused of stabbing his father to death in a argument. In the beginning of the trial all twelve of the jurors voted guilty. Many of the jurors were mean and did not give care about the boys future they just wanted to get the trial over with so the jurors can do what they wanted to do. Later in the case unitary of the jurors realized they were messing with a boys life and his future was all up to them. So a juror realized that some of the information that a witness brought up had to be false. So they analyzed the information and came to the conclusion that the boy could not have stabbed his father the way he did because one of the jurors had seen many knife fights in his backyard and you can not stab someone downward with a swi tchblade. Also another witness said that the knife that the kid had could be bought anywhere. The jurors discriminated the boy because he lived in the slums , he has a criminal record and he was always fighting with his dad so they just assumed he was the one that killed his dad.